Connie's Comments

Incisive observations on political, cultural, and spiritual topics, based on personal commitment to accuracy and honesty.
  April 2003 June 2003 October 2003 December 2003 January 2004 March 2004 May 2004 June 2004 September 2004 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 July 2006 August 2006 November 2006 December 2006 February 2007 April 2007 May 2007 August 2007 October 2007 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008
Monday, May 23, 2005

"What America Needs to Know"

by Connie Cook Smith

Do enough people realize it? That Bush relatives were in charge of World Trade Center security right up to the day the towers went down?

And that Jonathan Bush, the president's uncle, was on the board at Riggs Bank in Washington, which was directly tied to payments to two hijackers?

I included these documented facts in my initial 2003 lecture on 9/11, "A Somber Awakening," and re-stated them in my 2004 production, "Portal to Understanding."

Now the World Trade Center Bush-relatives'-security-problem is RE-CIRCULATING in what I call a "delicious sampler" of Prof. David Ray Griffin's expose' of the 9/11 Cover-Up.

Below are 11 points/samples (out of over-a-hundred) wherein Griffin asks, "Why would the minds in charge of the final 9/11 report engage in such deceptions...?"

Besides Bush relatives being in charge of "security" at the World Trade Center, and besides all the abundant proof that Mohammed Atta and Gang were drinkers and druggers, not "Muslim fundamentalists" at all -- additional facts about the towers are these:

That steel skyscrapers have never before collapsed from fire, especially from isolated fires burning for only an hour. A "security company" could easily have pre-planted explosives that turned the towers (and people!) into pulverized dust -- something that neither an airplane-strike, nor brief fires, could do.

The remains of the steel beams were hauled off to Asia immediately, were not allowed to be inspected for evidence of explosives -- which firemen suspected, even reported.

The page numbers after each point below refer to Griffin's book: "The 9/11 Commission Report," previously subtitled, "Omissions and Distortions," now subtitled: "A 571-page Lie."

Point 15 from Griffin: President Bush’s brother Marvin and his cousin Wirt Walker III were both principals in the company in charge of security for the WTC (pp. 31-32).

Point 10: The 9/11 Commission's claim that the core of each of the Twin Towers was “a hollow steel shaft” -- a claim that denies the existence of the 47 massive steel columns that in reality constituted the core of each tower...

Point 23: ...why did the Secret Service agents allow President Bush to remain at the Sarasota school at a time when they should have assumed that a hijacked airliner might be about to crash into the school? (41-44).

(In other words, NO protection-activity for the president and the school, even though New York and Washington had been attacked. How did they know that's all that would happen?)

27. The omission of David Schippers’ claim that he had on the basis of information provided by FBI agents about "upcoming attacks in lower Manhattan" tried unsuccessfully to convey this information to Attorney General Ashcroft for six weeks prior to 9/11 (51).

(David Schippers led the impeachment against Clinton and is no "Bush-bashing liberal.")

34. The omission of ... Abu Zubaydah’s testimony: three members of the Saudi royal family--all of whom later--
died mysteriously within an eight-day period
were funding al-Qaeda
(some of which DEFINITELY went through Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank, via Prince Bandar's wife. Remember "Bandar Bush" from Michael Moore's film?) (61-65).

35. The Commission’s DENIAL that it found any evidence of Saudi funding of al-Qaeda (65-68).

(When you protect the Saudis, you protect the Bushes.)

43. The omission of the 3.5 hours of testimony by former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds —- testimony that... revealed serious 9/11-related cover-ups by officials at FBI headquarters (94-101).

(Even though Sibel Edmonds has been repeatedly gagged by the government and the courts, she has clearly implied she saw evidence that money-laundering for 9/11 was tied to "prominent American officials.")

75. The failure to mention that the report that a large jet had crashed in Kentucky, at about the time Flight 77 disappeared from FAA radar, was taken seriously enough by the heads of the FAA and the FBI’s counterterrorism unit to be relayed to the White House (190).

(There continues to be raging debate about whether it was Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon. The FBI won't release any of the video tapes that would settle the matter.)

76. The claim that Flight 77 flew almost 40 minutes through American airspace towards Washington "without being detected by the military’s radar" (191-92).

(Oh, puh-leeze! After the World Trade Center had been hit by two planes, there was no concern about an off-course aircraft speeding towards Washington D.C.? Also -- there was no concern about the president, at a highly publicized location in Florida. Yawn.)

110. The Commission's failure to discuss the possible relevance of Operation Northwoods to the attacks of 9/11. (269-71).

(Operation Northwoods is the documented Joint Chiefs' plan to "crash airliners" in 1962 and blame Castro, in order to rile up Americans for an invasion of Cuba.)

111. The claim -- made in explaining why the military did not... intercept -- that
FAA personnel inexplicably failed to follow standard procedures some 16 times
(many page numbers provided).

Griffin asks:

Why would the minds in charge of this final 9/11 report engage in such deceptions if they were not trying to cover up very high crimes?” (291)

You can read his entire summary at:

Also, if you haven't already, please read my brief overview of why I became certain 3 years ago that the long-timers in OUR government planned and carried out 9/11 against the American people. (link below)

Like the Joint Chiefs' Operation Northwoods -- which thankfully was prevented by the Kennedy administration -- the plan to "crash airliners" and "blame Castro," to whip up Americans for war on Cuba -- well, it is JUST LIKE the 9/11 plan of "crashing airliners" by "Muslim fundamentalists" -- to whip up Americans for invasions (controlling the resources) of Muslim lands.

"Connie's lecture is also known as 'Who the Evildoers Really Are.' Even though her facts are hard-hitting and well-documented, her gentle style is almost therapeutic in opening the listener's mind to the unpleasant truths -- truths which must be grasped if American freedom is to survive."


  This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.  

Home  |  Archives